Responsibility for temporary waterproofing during the re-roofing process can be a complex issue. This is because it is likely that the roof is leaking before the contractor ever sets foot on the job. Should the contractor, by the act of commencing work, suddenly become responsible for leaks that existed before he got there? On the other hand, in the case of slope build up retrofit work. New attachments will be made which involve multitudes of penetrations through the existing membrane which were not there prior to the contractor performing his work. Should he be exonerated if they all leak during construction? Should the contractor be responsible for holes that he makes, and should the owner be responsible for pre-existing leaks? If so, who decides which is which?
It is highly advisable that this aspect of re-roofing is discussed prior to contract award,and then addressed contractually. The cleanest approach is a specification and contract provision which states that temporary repairs to pre-existing leaks are included in the scope of work, and to be performed by the contractor upon commencement of the project. This eliminates disputes if during construction there are leaks. It also, however may add cost to the project , which would otherwise be avoided. An alternative is that the contractor is responsible only for new leaks which he creates as a result of the re-roofing work. If the nature of the work is such that waterproofing during construction is either not possible or not included in the scope of work, then the contractor should be sure to so state in the contract.
In lieu of contractual provisions designating responsibility, the owner would continue to be responsible for pre-existing conditions, and the contractor would generally be responsible for any new conditions which arise due to his performance of the work. It is also normally understood by the owner that there are risks associated with a re-roofing project, and the contractor may not be able to guarantee complete freedom from leakage during the course of work. He would however, always have a responsibility to take reasonable percautions to waterproof his construction during the course of the work, and to minimize the risk of leak potential.
Because systems and attachment methods vary, as do existing roof and deck conditions, temporary waterproofing techniques also vary.
My next article will address temporary waterproofing techniques. In the mean time should you have any questions or concerns regarding this posting or other roofing issues please call 888-321-9630 or visit www.drexmet.com
Posted by: Bill Dooley ASCE, CSI
Director of Architectural Sales Drexel Metals, Inc.